"Towards a Science of Consciousness", Sweden 2001

  1. Introduction
  2. (Slide) "The Postdigital Membrane"

  3. Introduce book. Klée ("Taking an line for a walk"). Taking an idea for a walk, namely: There are no separations in the world. There is only the appearance of separation.
  4. (Slide) "There are no intrinsic separations in the world"

  5. Whilst this may be true as an abstract concept it seems to contradict our common experience of reality. We offer the idea of a membrane (literal and metaphorical) that shows how things can be both separate and connected. Membranes separate the things they connect.
  6. (Slide) "Permeable membrane"

  7. For example, in philosophical discourse the human being is separated from its environment by having an apparent inside and outside. The skin (Cutaneous Membrane) acts as a barrier but also transmitter and regulator. So the inside and outside are continuous, which has philosophical implications.
  8. (Slide) "Continuous human"

  9. This is one sense, also, in which the term postdigital is useful in that the membrane transcends the "1" or "0", "all or nothing" logic to which systems tend to be reduced in binary modelling without erasing the distinctions.
  10. (Slide) "Postdigital"

  11. One of the problems we apply this approach to is that of consciousness. Perhaps the most important ideas is that, for the purposes of studying consciousness, one cannot isolation the brain from the body, or for that matter, the environment.
  12. (Slide) " Consciousness is not confined to the brain"

  13. Rather than seeking a cause for consciousness in the brain, it would be more accurate to say that consciousness is a property that emerges from a given set of conditions, which include the brain but many others as well. There are well-known phenomena that can’t be reduced to a single cause or location: The Kettle example.
  14. (Slide) Kettle image

  15. We make a hard problem even harder if we look in the wrong place for the explanation. To deal with the specific theme of this series of talks: Neither Dualism (Idealism) nor Materialism is any longer useful ways to think about the problem. Dualism because it imposes an inherent distinction between mind and brain, and Materialism because it imposes an inherent distinction between brain, body and environment.
  16. (Slide) Dualism and Materialism

  17. If we cannot separate the brain and the body for the purposes of studying consciousness it is equally true that we cannot separate the body from its environment. Just as many of our states of feeling arise in conjunction with the body (hunger, alarm, desire, etc.) so many of our conscious thoughts are responses to the stimuli of the world (lights, smells, noises, etc.). We have to acknowledge the continuity between brain, body and environment in the production of consciousness.
  18. (Slide) "Consciousness cannot be confined to the brain or the body"

  19. It is in this sense that consciousness or mind can be seen as pervading the world we are conscious in. Much the same can be said of intelligence, imagination and other complex aspects of human existence normally confined to the brain. For example, we encode or embody our intelligence in other matter such that it can later be retrieved by negotiation with other intelligent beings.
  20. (Slide) Rembrandt self-portrait.

  21. This is equally true of machines that embody our intelligence such as those specifically designed to mimic mental behaviour. They are already intelligent, or conscious, to the extent that they embody those qualities that we endow them with. They are part of our extended mind. Indeed, it was the possibility of conscious machines that suggested the mind might exist beyond the brain in the first place.
  22. (Slide) "Intelligence consists as much in its expression as in its conception"

  23. Postdigital website